Process for the gas phase polymerisation of olefins

Inactive Publication Date: 2016-01-05
INEOS SALES (UK) LTD
View PDF17 Cites 0 Cited by
  • Summary
  • Abstract
  • Description
  • Claims
  • Application Information

AI Technical Summary

Benefits of technology

[0074]The present invention is particularly applicable to single site metallocene-type catalysts and Ziegler catalysts. For example, with Ziegler catalysts it has been found that the ratios of comonomer to monomer and hydrogen to comonomer at the top of the fluidised bed can be significantly higher than the same ratios at the base of the bed. If fines are recycled to the top of the bed this leads to significant production of a relatively low density, high Melt Index polymer with low melting point compared to that produced at the base of the bed.
[0075]With respect to single site metallocene catalysts, these have a relatively high a

Problems solved by technology

There are a number of reasons for this, not least of which is that it is technicall

Method used

the structure of the environmentally friendly knitted fabric provided by the present invention; figure 2 Flow chart of the yarn wrapping machine for environmentally friendly knitted fabrics and storage devices; image 3 Is the parameter map of the yarn covering machine
View more

Examples

Experimental program
Comparison scheme
Effect test

Example

Example 1

Metallocene Catalyst

[0087]In a first set of experiments, a metallocene catalyst was simulated using ethylene and 1-hexene, in the presence of hydrogen, to produce a polyethylene having a density of 918 kg / m3 and a melt index of 3.5 g / 10 min.

[0088]The reactor conditions were selected for two different production rates. As a comparative example, the process was simulated at a production rate of 30 tonnes / hour, corresponding to a space-time yield (STY) of 57 kg / hr / m3. A condensation rate of 7.3 wt % was used. Under these conditions the ratio of hydrogen:ethylene at the top of the fluidised bed compared to the ratio of hydrogen:ethylene at the base of the fluidised bed was 1.022 i.e. there was a 2% difference in the ratio. (A value of 1 indicates the same ratio of components at both the top and base of the fluidised bed). Similarly, the ratio of 1-hexene:ethylene at the top of the fluidised bed compared to the ratio of 1-hexene:ethylene at the base of the fluidised bed w

Example

Example 2

Ziegler-Natta Catalyst

[0090]In a second set of simulations, a Ziegler-Natta catalyst was used to react ethylene and 1-hexene, in the presence of hydrogen, to produce a polyethylene having a density of 936 kg / m3, melt index of 0.9 g / 10 min.

[0091]The reactor was again operated at two different production rates. As a comparative example, the process was operated at a production rate of 30 tonnes / hour, corresponding to a space-time yield (STY) of 57 kg / hr / m3. A condensation rate of 1 wt % was used. Under these conditions the ratio of hydrogen:ethylene at the top of the fluidised bed compared to the ratio of hydrogen:ethylene at the base of the fluidised bed was 1.05 i.e. there was a 5% difference in the ratio. Similarly, the ratio of 1-hexene:ethylene at the top of the fluidised bed compared to the ratio of 1-hexene:ethylene at the base of the fluidised bed was 1.04 i.e. there was a 4% increase in the ratio.

[0092]Whilst not insignificant, under these conditions a uniform

Example

Example 3

Ziegler-Natta Catalyst

[0093]In a third set of simulations, a Ziegler-Natta catalyst was again used to react ethylene and 1-hexene, in the presence of hydrogen, this time to produce a polyethylene having a density of 918 kg / m3, melt index 3 g / 10 min.

[0094]The reactor was again simulated at two different production rates. As a comparative example, the process was simulated at a production rate of 30 tonnes / hour. No condensation was used. Under these conditions the ratio of hydrogen:ethylene at the top of the fluidised bed compared to the ratio of hydrogen:ethylene at the base of the fluidised bed was 1.115 i.e. there was an 11.5% difference in the ratio. Similarly, the ratio of 1-hexene:ethylene at the top of the fluidised bed compared to the ratio of 1-hexene:ethylene at the base of the fluidised bed was 1.025 i.e. there was a 2.5% increase in the ratio. Whilst not insignificant, under these conditions a uniform operation was obtained.

[0095]The production rate was then si

the structure of the environmentally friendly knitted fabric provided by the present invention; figure 2 Flow chart of the yarn wrapping machine for environmentally friendly knitted fabrics and storage devices; image 3 Is the parameter map of the yarn covering machine
Login to view more

PUM

PropertyMeasurementUnit
Mass flow rateaaaaaaaaaa
Pressureaaaaaaaaaa
Pressure dropaaaaaaaaaa
Login to view more

Abstract

Process for the gas phase polymerization of olefins, in particular, with recycle of fines to the reaction zone. The process includes (a) polymerizing an olefin in a reaction zone in which a bed of polymer particles is maintained in an agitated state by passing a fluid stream through the bed, (b) withdrawing the fluid stream from the reactor after it has passed through the bed of polymer particles, (c) separating entrained solids from the withdrawn fluid stream, and (d) returning the separated entrained solids to the reaction zone. The polymer production rate of the process is at least 40 tonnes/hour, and the separated solids from step (c) are returned to the lower half of the bed of polymer particles in the reaction zone.

Description

the structure of the environmentally friendly knitted fabric provided by the present invention; figure 2 Flow chart of the yarn wrapping machine for environmentally friendly knitted fabrics and storage devices; image 3 Is the parameter map of the yarn covering machine
Login to view more

Claims

the structure of the environmentally friendly knitted fabric provided by the present invention; figure 2 Flow chart of the yarn wrapping machine for environmentally friendly knitted fabrics and storage devices; image 3 Is the parameter map of the yarn covering machine
Login to view more

Application Information

Patent Timeline
no application Login to view more
Owner INEOS SALES (UK) LTD
Who we serve
  • R&D Engineer
  • R&D Manager
  • IP Professional
Why Eureka
  • Industry Leading Data Capabilities
  • Powerful AI technology
  • Patent DNA Extraction
Social media
Try Eureka
PatSnap group products